i see you put 2 cubes of energy into the air but their really should be a little more because theirs actually at least 2 types of energy that is caused with the ball going into the air. theirs at least thermal energy and friction between the ground and the air.
How does an object always have potential energy if it's not moving. Potential is stored, kinetic is moving. The ball is moving so it's kinetic. Sayarpreet Walia P.3
Do you think it is possible for an object to have BOTH kinetic and potential energies at the same time? Can you think of an example where this might be the case?
The mechanical doesn't just go into the ground, it goes into the ground, then the energy rebounds back into the ball making it soar. Sayarpreet Walia P.3
There wasn't a lot of explanation of how mechanical energy transformed into other forms of energy (Sound, Thermal, etc.). Also I'm assuming that the mechanical energy came from something else, such as potential gravitational or other mechanical energy, but can you clarify that point? Poster 2 made a good point.
Wouldn't the ball bounce back up leading to more energy transfers and transformation you did not explain? What surface is the ball being dropped onto, because that can play a roll in energy transformation and transfers?
I thought your video demonstration was pretty clear, my group picked the same scenario. Did you consider there might be some other energy transfers when the ball drops to the ground?
i see you put 2 cubes of energy into the air but their really should be a little more because theirs actually at least 2 types of energy that is caused with the ball going into the air. theirs at least thermal energy and friction between the ground and the air.
ReplyDeleteSarah, Chrissy, Sadee, Shelby
So if you think there should be more than 2 cubes, do you think an equal amount of cubes would be in the ball?
DeleteI noticed that your drawing of the bubbles didn't make sense. Is the ball coming off the ground or falling from your hand?
ReplyDeleteJoanna - what type of energy stayed in the hand?
ReplyDeletewouldn't the ball bounce back up?
ReplyDelete-Benen
That wasn't the situation just the ball hitting the ground, not bouncing back up. Cameron "See Ya in 1st" Bunger. P6
Deletewhile the ball is bouncing it would not potential, it would be kinetic
ReplyDelete-benen
At what points do you think the ball has potential energy?
DeleteHow does an object always have potential energy if it's not moving. Potential is stored, kinetic is moving. The ball is moving so it's kinetic.
ReplyDeleteSayarpreet Walia
P.3
Do you think it is possible for an object to have BOTH kinetic and potential energies at the same time? Can you think of an example where this might be the case?
DeleteI noticed you didnt include the bubble of the hand dropping the ball . Why is that ?
ReplyDeleteThe mechanical doesn't just go into the ground, it goes into the ground, then the energy rebounds back into the ball making it soar.
ReplyDeleteSayarpreet Walia
P.3
There wasn't a lot of explanation of how mechanical energy transformed into other forms of energy (Sound, Thermal, etc.). Also I'm assuming that the mechanical energy came from something else, such as potential gravitational or other mechanical energy, but can you clarify that point? Poster 2 made a good point.
ReplyDeleteBrendan J. Period 3
Sorry, Brendan Jacobsen Period 3
DeleteThe drawing of the bubbles and the arrows were confusing
ReplyDeleteWouldn't the ball bounce back up leading to more energy transfers and transformation you did not explain? What surface is the ball being dropped onto, because that can play a roll in energy transformation and transfers?
ReplyDeleteFrancisco S. Period 3
When the ball is bouncing, wouldnt the energy transfer from potential gravitational to kinetic mechanical?
ReplyDeleteIs this on the way down or back up?
DeleteI thought your video demonstration was pretty clear, my group picked the same scenario. Did you consider there might be some other energy transfers when the ball drops to the ground?
ReplyDeleteAllie Per. 3
There shouldn't be any potential energy left in the ball.
ReplyDelete-John Koo Per. 3
At what points do you think there is no potential energy left in the ball?
DeleteI thought the narration was good job kids.
ReplyDeleteAbby p.4
Thank you.
DeleteNick Sundvall p6
do you have that many cubes on purpose?
ReplyDeleteabby p.4
really good experiment but think there should be more cubes in the air.
ReplyDeleteShirley per.4
Why do you think there should be more cubes in the air?
DeleteThere wouldnt be any potential energy left.
ReplyDeleteTrinitylandholm per6
At what point would there be no potential energy left?
DeleteHey,
ReplyDeleteHow is it kinetic when the ball is moving? And also, shouldn't there be gravitational energy when the ball falls from your hand?
Josh Terre - Period 6
The ball moving had mechanical kinetic enegry because mechanical energy is when something moves from one place to another.
DeleteNick Sundvall, Period 6
I though it was well done. The energy distribution was well done considering the factors. Cameron Bunger. P6
Delete